Sunday, June 2, 2019

STAR INVESTIGATION :: essays research papers

Format Internet Journalism and the Starr Investigation     The Starr Investigation was an important time in journalism, because it forced the traditional media to authorise their ways of presenting news online in order to meet the needs and demands of Internet users. New technology was used in this case to break the news of the scandal, to congressman new allegations, and to release in its entirety Starrs final report of the investigation. This case provided the first detailed look at the differences in character betwixt the Internet and traditional broadcast and print media.The ethical issues in Internet Journalism and the Starr Investigation1. Was this a legitimate news trading floor?2. Intense journalistic competition? Journalists of all stripes were chasing the story.3. CREDIBILITY of the paper? Reporting Facts that in the end proved false.Editors doubtful of the storys accuracy? The reliability of the study?4. The Value of Verification to get the story right?5. Anonymous Sourcing/ Unidentified Sources - Journalists scrambled to confirm the allegations, but often ended up running them with whole anonymous sourcing.6. Speed, sensation and conjecture over accuracy? CNNs Scott Woelfel says he sensed in the early going that, "there was an attitude of, I dont know if we could put this in the paper, but we could put it on the Web site." 7.News Leakage? Certain sources in the independent counsels office were using the press, selectively leaking information to come upon tactical advantage with reluctant witnesses like Lewinsky. McManus recalls. So there was clearly a lot of leakage.8. The breaking of the story. Matt Drudge breaking the story through and through his online newsletter? - Wire services sent the story worldwide. Cable networks, radio shows, and local television newscasts led with the report. Larry King interrupted his program to read the story live.9. The story was so explosive that Bill Clintons attorney called Nigh tline and DENIED the story on the air.10. SHAKY SOURCING? Reports were based around shaky sourcing.- The Dallas Morning News and the border Street Journal reported that the president and the intern had been seen together in a compromising situation.- Starrs staff member called the source to take rearward the claim because it was FALSE.- Langer told the employees that the News had unwittingly relied on only one source to publish its original story.11. Timing and public interest 12. Violating the papers two-source standard.13. Miscommunication - old editors mistakenly believed that a second source existed because of a miscommunication between Dallas and the Washington bureau.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.